+1

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:39 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> I diffed the binary contents of the 0.1 jar and 0.2 jar with no changes to
> the contents of the files and can confirm that module-info.class the
> offending Main.class and Main$1.class have been removed as well.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:38 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor:
>>  * beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.2,
>> as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1],
>> which is signed with the key with
>> fingerprint EAD5DE293F4A03DD2E77565589E68A56E371CCA2 [2],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
>> * commit hash "91125d1d1fc1fe8c5684a486c9b6163c4ec41549" [4],
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Release Manager
>>
>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/vendor/
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> [3]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1092/
>> [4]
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/91125d1d1fc1fe8c5684a486c9b6163c4ec41549
>>
>

Reply via email to