+1 (binding)
verified hashes

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:20 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> Verified signatures
> Verified that there are no conscrypt classes in jar
> Verified pom.xml has runtime dependency on conscrypt
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Le mar. 3 mars 2020 ? 19:31, Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> a ?crit :
>>
>>> Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor:
>>>  * beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.3,
>>> as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1],
>>> which is signed with the key with
>>> fingerprint EAD5DE293F4A03DD2E77565589E68A56E371CCA2 [2],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
>>> * commit hash "7df0d6cda0b1e1d5d360ea68c9ee01ca35acc230" [4],
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Release Manager
>>>
>>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/vendor/
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> [3]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1096/
>>> [4]
>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/7df0d6cda0b1e1d5d360ea68c9ee01ca35acc230
>>>
>>

Reply via email to