Everything I've been looking at is in the /tmp dir. Where are the
workspaces, or what are the named?




On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:03 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:

> I'm curious to what you find. Was it /tmp or the workspaces using up the
> space?
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:57 AM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Bleck. I just realized that it is 'offline' so that won't work. I'll
>> clean up manually on the machine using the cron command.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:56 AM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Something isn't working with the current set up because node 15 appears
>>> to be out of space and is currently 'offline' according to Jenkins. Can
>>> someone run the cleanup job? The machine is full,
>>>
>>> @apache-ci-beam-jenkins-15:/tmp$ df -h
>>> Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>> udev             52G     0   52G   0% /dev
>>> tmpfs            11G  265M   10G   3% /run
>>> */dev/sda1       485G  484G  880M 100% /*
>>> tmpfs            52G     0   52G   0% /dev/shm
>>> tmpfs           5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
>>> tmpfs            52G     0   52G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
>>> tmpfs            11G     0   11G   0% /run/user/1017
>>> tmpfs            11G     0   11G   0% /run/user/1037
>>>
>>> apache-ci-beam-jenkins-15:/tmp$ sudo du -ah --time . | sort -rhk 1,1 |
>>> head -n 20
>>> 20G     2020-07-24 17:52        .
>>> 580M    2020-07-22 17:31        ./junit1031982597110125586
>>> 517M    2020-07-22 17:31
>>>  ./junit1031982597110125586/junit8739924829337821410/heap_dump.hprof
>>> 517M    2020-07-22 17:31
>>>  ./junit1031982597110125586/junit8739924829337821410
>>> 263M    2020-07-22 12:23        ./pip-install-2GUhO_
>>> 263M    2020-07-20 09:30        ./pip-install-sxgwqr
>>> 263M    2020-07-17 13:56        ./pip-install-bWSKIV
>>> 242M    2020-07-21 20:25        ./beam-pipeline-tempmByU6T
>>> 242M    2020-07-21 20:21        ./beam-pipeline-tempV85xeK
>>> 242M    2020-07-21 20:15        ./beam-pipeline-temp7dJROJ
>>> 236M    2020-07-21 20:25        ./beam-pipeline-tempmByU6T/tmpOWj3Yr
>>> 236M    2020-07-21 20:21        ./beam-pipeline-tempV85xeK/tmppbQHB3
>>> 236M    2020-07-21 20:15        ./beam-pipeline-temp7dJROJ/tmpgOXPKW
>>> 111M    2020-07-23 00:57        ./pip-install-1JnyNE
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:17        ./beam-artifact1374651823280819755
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:16        ./beam-artifact5050755582921936972
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:16        ./beam-artifact1834064452502646289
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:15        ./beam-artifact682561790267074916
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:15        ./beam-artifact4691304965824489394
>>> 105M    2020-07-23 00:14        ./beam-artifact4050383819822604421
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:03 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:57 AM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah I see, thanks Kenn. I found some advice from the Apache infra wiki
>>>>> that also suggests using a tmpdir inside the workspace [1]:
>>>>>
>>>>> Procedures Projects can take to clean up disk space
>>>>>
>>>>> Projects can help themselves and Infra by taking some basic steps to
>>>>> help clean up their jobs after themselves on the build nodes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Use a ./tmp dir in your jobs workspace. That way it gets
>>>>>    cleaned up when job workspaces expire.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Tests should be (able to be) written to use the standard temporary file
>>>> mechanisms, and the environment set up on Jenkins such that that falls into
>>>> the respective workspaces. Ideally this should be as simple as setting
>>>> the TMPDIR (or similar) environment variable (and making sure it exists/is
>>>> writable).
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Configure your jobs to wipe workspaces on start or finish.
>>>>>    2. Configure your jobs to only keep 5 or 10 previous builds.
>>>>>    3. Configure your jobs to only keep 5 or 10 previous artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]:
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Disk+Space+cleanup+of+Jenkins+nodes
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Those file listings look like the result of using standard temp file
>>>>>> APIs but with TMPDIR set to /tmp.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:55 PM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jobs are hermetic as far as I can tell and use unique subdirectories
>>>>>>> inside of /tmp. Here is a quick look into two examples:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @apache-ci-beam-jenkins-4:/tmp$ sudo du -ah --time . | sort -rhk 1,1
>>>>>>> | head -n 20
>>>>>>> 1.6G    2020-07-21 02:25        .
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:48        ./beam-pipeline-temp3ybuY4
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:46        ./beam-pipeline-tempuxjiPT
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:44        ./beam-pipeline-tempVpg1ME
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:42        ./beam-pipeline-tempJ4EpyB
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:39        ./beam-pipeline-tempepea7Q
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-17 18:35        ./beam-pipeline-temp79qot2
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:48        ./beam-pipeline-temp3ybuY4/tmpy_Ytzz
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:46        ./beam-pipeline-tempuxjiPT/tmpN5_UfJ
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:44        ./beam-pipeline-tempVpg1ME/tmpxSm8pX
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:42        ./beam-pipeline-tempJ4EpyB/tmpMZJU76
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:39        ./beam-pipeline-tempepea7Q/tmpWy1vWX
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-17 18:35        ./beam-pipeline-temp79qot2/tmpvN7vWA
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:48        ./beam-pipeline-temp3ybuY4/tmprlh_di
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:46        ./beam-pipeline-tempuxjiPT/tmpLmVWfe
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:44        ./beam-pipeline-tempVpg1ME/tmpvrxbY7
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:42        ./beam-pipeline-tempJ4EpyB/tmpLTb6Mj
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:39        ./beam-pipeline-tempepea7Q/tmptYF1v1
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-17 18:35        ./beam-pipeline-temp79qot2/tmplfV0Rg
>>>>>>> 2.7M    2020-07-17 20:10        ./pip-install-q9l227ef
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @apache-ci-beam-jenkins-11:/tmp$ sudo du -ah --time . | sort -rhk
>>>>>>> 1,1 | head -n 20
>>>>>>> 817M    2020-07-21 02:26        .
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-19 12:14        ./beam-pipeline-tempUTXqlM
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-19 12:11        ./beam-pipeline-tempx3Yno3
>>>>>>> 242M    2020-07-19 12:05        ./beam-pipeline-tempyCrMYq
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-19 12:14        ./beam-pipeline-tempUTXqlM/tmpstXoL0
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-19 12:11        ./beam-pipeline-tempx3Yno3/tmpnnVn65
>>>>>>> 236M    2020-07-19 12:05        ./beam-pipeline-tempyCrMYq/tmpRF0iNs
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-19 12:14        ./beam-pipeline-tempUTXqlM/tmpbJjUAQ
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-19 12:11        ./beam-pipeline-tempx3Yno3/tmpsmmzqe
>>>>>>> 3.7M    2020-07-19 12:05        ./beam-pipeline-tempyCrMYq/tmp5b3ZvY
>>>>>>> 2.0M    2020-07-19 12:14        ./beam-pipeline-tempUTXqlM/tmpoj3orz
>>>>>>> 2.0M    2020-07-19 12:11        ./beam-pipeline-tempx3Yno3/tmptng9sZ
>>>>>>> 2.0M    2020-07-19 12:05        ./beam-pipeline-tempyCrMYq/tmpWp6njc
>>>>>>> 1.2M    2020-07-19 12:14        ./beam-pipeline-tempUTXqlM/tmphgdj35
>>>>>>> 1.2M    2020-07-19 12:11        ./beam-pipeline-tempx3Yno3/tmp8ySXpm
>>>>>>> 1.2M    2020-07-19 12:05        ./beam-pipeline-tempyCrMYq/tmpNVEJ4e
>>>>>>> 992K    2020-07-12 12:00        ./junit642086915811430564
>>>>>>> 988K    2020-07-12 12:00        ./junit642086915811430564/beam
>>>>>>> 984K    2020-07-12 12:00        ./junit642086915811430564/beam/nodes
>>>>>>> 980K    2020-07-12 12:00
>>>>>>>  ./junit642086915811430564/beam/nodes/0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:46 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're right, job workspaces should be hermetic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm probably late to this discussion and missing something, but
>>>>>>>>> why are we writing to /tmp at all? I would expect TMPDIR to point 
>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>> inside the job directory that will be wiped by Jenkins, and I would 
>>>>>>>>> expect
>>>>>>>>> code to always create temp files via APIs that respect this. Is 
>>>>>>>>> Jenkins not
>>>>>>>>> cleaning up? Do we not have the ability to set this up? Do we have 
>>>>>>>>> bugs in
>>>>>>>>> our code (that we could probably find by setting TMPDIR to somewhere
>>>>>>>>> not-/tmp and running the tests without write permission to /tmp, etc)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Related to workspace directory growth, +Udi Meiri
>>>>>>>>>> <eh...@google.com> filed a relevant issue previously (
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9865) for cleaning up
>>>>>>>>>> workspace directory after successful jobs. Alternatively, we can 
>>>>>>>>>> consider
>>>>>>>>>> periodically cleaning up the /src directories.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest moving the cron task from internal cron scripts
>>>>>>>>>> to the inventory job (
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/jenkins/job_Inventory.groovy#L51).
>>>>>>>>>> That way, we can see all the cron jobs as part of the source tree, 
>>>>>>>>>> adjust
>>>>>>>>>> frequencies and clean up codes with PRs. I do not know how internal 
>>>>>>>>>> cron
>>>>>>>>>> scripts are created, maintained, and how would they be recreated for 
>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>> worker instances.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /cc +Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:50 AM Damian Gadomski <
>>>>>>>>>> damian.gadom...@polidea.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've recently created a solution for the growing /tmp directory.
>>>>>>>>>>> Part of it is the job mentioned by Tyson:
>>>>>>>>>>> *beam_Clean_tmp_directory*. It's intentionally not triggered by
>>>>>>>>>>> cron and should be a last resort solution for some strange cases.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Along with that job, I've also updated every worker with an
>>>>>>>>>>> internal cron script. It's being executed once a week and deletes 
>>>>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>>>>> files (and only files) that were not accessed for at least three 
>>>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>>> That's designed to be as safe as possible for the running jobs on 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> worker (not to delete the files that are still in use), and also to 
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> insensitive to the current workload on the machine. The cleanup 
>>>>>>>>>>> will always
>>>>>>>>>>> happen, even if some long-running/stuck jobs are blocking the 
>>>>>>>>>>> machine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I also think that currently the "No space left" errors may be a
>>>>>>>>>>> consequence of growing workspace directory rather than /tmp. I 
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't do
>>>>>>>>>>> any detailed analysis but e.g. currently, on apache-beam-jenkins-7 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> workspace directory size is 158 GB while /tmp is only 16 GB. We 
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> either guarantee the disk size to hold workspaces for all jobs 
>>>>>>>>>>> (because
>>>>>>>>>>> eventually, every worker will execute each job) or clear also the
>>>>>>>>>>> workspaces in some way.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Damian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:43 AM Maximilian Michels <
>>>>>>>>>>> m...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for scheduling it via a cron job if it won't lead to test
>>>>>>>>>>>> failures
>>>>>>>>>>>> while running. Not a Jenkins expert but maybe there is the
>>>>>>>>>>>> notion of
>>>>>>>>>>>> running exclusively while no other tasks are running?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17.07.20 21:49, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> > FYI there was a job introduced to do this in Jenkins:
>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_Clean_tmp_directory
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Currently it needs to be run manually. I'm seeing some out of
>>>>>>>>>>>> disk related errors in precommit tests currently, perhaps we should
>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule this job with cron?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > On 2020/03/11 19:31:13, Heejong Lee <heej...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Still seeing no space left on device errors on jenkins-7
>>>>>>>>>>>> (for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_PythonLint_Commit/2754/
>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 7:11 PM Alan Myrvold <
>>>>>>>>>>>> amyrv...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Did a one time cleanup of tmp files owned by jenkins older
>>>>>>>>>>>> than 3 days.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Agree that we need a longer term solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Passing recent tests on all executors except jenkins-12,
>>>>>>>>>>>> which has not
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> scheduled recent builds for the past 13 days. Not
>>>>>>>>>>>> scheduling:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-12/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-12/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Recent passing builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-1/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-1/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-2/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-2/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-3/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-3/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-4/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-4/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-5/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-5/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-6/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-6/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-7/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-7/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-8/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-8/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-9/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-9/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-10/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-10/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-11/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-11/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-13/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-13/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-14/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-14/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-15/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-15/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-16/builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://builds.apache.org/computer/apache-beam-jenkins-16/builds&sa=D
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ahmet Altay <
>>>>>>>>>>>> al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> +Alan Myrvold <amyrv...@google.com> is doing a one time
>>>>>>>>>>>> cleanup. I agree
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> that we need to have a solution to automate this task or
>>>>>>>>>>>> address the root
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> cause of the buildup.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:47 AM Michał Walenia <
>>>>>>>>>>>> michal.wale...@polidea.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> it seems we have a problem with Jenkins workers again.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nodes 1 and 7
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> both fail jobs with "No space left on device".
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is the best person to contact in these cases (someone
>>>>>>>>>>>> with access
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> permissions to the workers).
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> I also noticed that such errors are becoming more and
>>>>>>>>>>>> more frequent
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> recently and I'd like to discuss how can this be
>>>>>>>>>>>> remedied. Can a cleanup
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> task be automated on Jenkins somehow?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Michal
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Michał Walenia
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> M: +48 791 432 002 <+48%20791%20432%20002> <+48791432002
>>>>>>>>>>>> <+48%20791%20432%20002>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> E: michal.wale...@polidea.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Unique Tech
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to