AFAIK, in Beam, we don’t have any “official” benchmarks or load tests that are running with any of portable runners. It would be a great improvement if we would have them.
— Alexey > On 28 Jul 2022, at 19:30, Bharath Kumara Subramanian > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > We are currently working on making beam portable mode mainstream in addition > to supporting classic mode for Samza runner. > > I was looking at OSS benchmarks on how other runners performed in portable > mode in comparison with the classic mode. However, all I found was > performance numbers and metrics for various classic runners > <http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/1/getting-started?orgId=1&viewPanel=123125>. > > Checking in to see if anyone in the community has benchmarked portable mode > numbers for their runners. > > Additionally, I found vanilla metrics around GRPC performance > <https://grafana-dot-grpc-testing.appspot.com/?orgId=1>, although I am > looking for pointers to get granular insights on E2E pipeline latency. e.g., > the time spent on network across stages vs serialization cost for GRPC vs > actual time spent executing the ParDO and so-on. > > > Thanks, > Bharath >
