Hi all,

regarding the recent threads on the mailing list, I would like to start a format discussion around the IO. As we can expect the first contributions on this area (I already have some work in progress around this ;)), I think it's a fair discussion to have.

Now, we have two kinds of IO: the one "generic" to Beam, the one "local" to the runners.

For example, let's take Kafka: we have the KafkaIO (in IO), and for instance, we have the spark-streaming kafka connector (in Spark Runner).

Right now, we have two approaches for the user:
1. In the pipeline, we use KafkaIO from Beam: it's the preferred approach for sure. However, the user may want to use the runner specific IO for two reasons: * Beam doesn't provide the IO yet (for instance, spark cassandra connector is available whereas we don't have yet any CassandraIO (I'm working on it anyway ;)) * The runner native IO is optimized or contain more features that the Beam native IO 2. So, for the previous reasons, the user could want to use the native runner IO. The drawback of this approach is that the pipeline will be tight to a specific runner, which is completely against the Beam design.

I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to add flag on the IO API (and related on Runner API) like .useNative().

For instance, the user would be able to do:

pipeline.apply(KafkaIO.read().withBootstrapServers("...").withTopics("...").useNative(true);

then, if the runner has a "native" IO, it will use it, else, if useNative(false) (the default), it won't use any runner native IO.

The point there is for the configuration: assuming the Beam IO and the runner IO can differ, it means that the "Beam IO" would have to populate all runner specific IO configuration.

Of course, it's always possible to use a PTransform to wrap the runner native IO, but we are back on the same concern: the pipeline will be couple to a specific runner.

The purpose of the useNative() flag is to "automatically" inform the runner to use a specific IO if it has one: the pipeline stays decoupled from the runners.

Thoughts ?

Thanks
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to