Hi

For the website I already proposed a new design and css: 
http://maven.nanthrax.net/beam/

I plan to provide a PR very soon.

I'm late on that.

Regards
JB



On Oct 5, 2016, 20:21, at 20:21, James Malone <jamesmal...@google.com.INVALID> 
wrote:
>Hi all!
>
>I want to revive this thread if I may. Is there any way I can help on
>the
>website redesign? Additionally, is anyone currently working on the
>UI/UX
>design? I want to make sure I don't duplicate any work.
>
>Cheers!
>
>James
>
>On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Frances Perry <f...@google.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Just an update for everyone...
>>
>> The new website navigation structure is roughly in place. However
>there's
>> still work remaining to fill in the pages with the right content.
>There are
>> bugs in JIRA tracking the major gaps.
>>
>> In addition, JB is working on new CSS to give our site a snazzier
>look ;-)
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Good point. It make sense to wait that it's actually implemented
>and
>> > available before putting on the website.
>> >
>> > Thanks !
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> >
>> > On 06/17/2016 07:01 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>> >
>> >> Good thoughts.
>> >>
>> >> There'll be a section on IO that comes over as part of the
>programming
>> >> guide being ported from the Cloud Dataflow docs. Hopefully that
>has the
>> >> technical info needed. Once we see how that's structured (Devin is
>still
>> >> playing around with a single page or multiple), then we can decide
>if we
>> >> need to make it more visible. Maybe we should add a summary table
>to the
>> >> overview page too?
>> >>
>> >> As for DSLs, I think it remains to be seen how we tightly we
>choose to
>> >> integrate them into Beam. As we've started discussing before, we
>may
>> >> decide
>> >> that some of them belong elsewhere because they change the
>user-visible
>> >> concepts, but should be discoverable from our documentation. Or
>others
>> may
>> >> more closely align and just expose subsets. But in any case --
>totally
>> >> agree we should add the right concepts when we cross that bridge.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><j...@nanthrax.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Frances,
>> >>>
>> >>> great doc !
>> >>>
>> >>> Maybe in the "Learn" section, we can also add IOs (like SDKs, and
>> >>> runners), like we do in Camel
>(http://camel.apache.org/components.html
>> )
>> >>> For the SDKs, I would also add DSLs in the same section.
>> >>>
>> >>> WDYT ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> JB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 06/17/2016 12:21 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Good point, JB -- let's redo the page layout as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I started with your proposal and tweaked it a bit to add in more
>> details
>> >>>> and divide things a bit more according to use case (end user vs.
>> >>>> runner/sdk
>> >>>> developer):
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-0jMv7NnYp0Ttt4voulUMwVe_
>> qjBYeNMLm2LusYF3gQ/edit
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Let me know what you think, and what part you'd like to drive!
>I'd
>> >>>> suggest
>> >>>> we get the new section layout set this week, so we can
>parallelize
>> site
>> >>>> design and assorted page content.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><j...@nanthrax.net
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi James,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> very good idea !
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Couple of month ago, I completely revamped the Karaf website:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It could be a good skeleton in term of sections/pages.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> IMHO, for Beam, at least for the home page, we should have:
>> >>>>> 1. a clear message about what Beam is from an user perspective:
>why
>> >>>>> should
>> >>>>> I use Beam and write pipelines, what's the value, etc. The
>runner
>> >>>>> writers,
>> >>>>> or DSL writers will find their resources but not on the
>homepage (on
>> >>>>> dedicated section of the website).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> In term of sections, we could propose
>> >>>>> 1.1. Overview (with the three perspective/type of users)
>> >>>>> 1.2. Libraries: SDKs, DSLs, IOs, Runners
>> >>>>> 1.3. Documentation: Dev Guide, Samples, Runners Writer guide,
>...
>> >>>>> 1.4. Community: mailing list, contribution guide, ...
>> >>>>> 1.5. Apache (link to ASF)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2. a look'n feel should be clean and professional, at least for
>the
>> >>>>> home
>> >>>>> page.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I would love to help here !
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>>> JB
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 06/06/2016 05:29 PM, James Malone wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hello everyone!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The current design of the Apache Beam website[1] is based on
>the a
>> >>>>>> basic
>> >>>>>> Bootstrap/Jekyll theme. While this made getting an initial
>site out
>> >>>>>> quickly
>> >>>>>> pretty easy, the site itself is a little bland (in my opinion
>:). I
>> >>>>>> propose
>> >>>>>> we create a new design (layout templates, color schemes,
>visual
>> >>>>>> design)
>> >>>>>> for
>> >>>>>> the Beam website.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Since the website is currently using Bootstrap and Jekyll,
>this
>> should
>> >>>>>> be
>> >>>>>> a
>> >>>>>> relatively easy process. Getting this done will require a new
>design
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>> some CSS/HTML work. Additionally, before a design is put in
>place, I
>> >>>>>> think
>> >>>>>> it makes sense to discuss any ideas about a future design
>first.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> So, I think there are two open questions behind this proposal:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 1. Is there anyone within the community who would be
>interested in
>> >>>>>> creating
>> >>>>>> a design proposal or two and sharing them with the community?
>> >>>>>> 2. Are there any ideas, opinions, and thoughts around what the
>> design
>> >>>>>> of
>> >>>>>> the site *should* be?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What does everyone think?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cheers!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> James
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [1]: http://beam.incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>> >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>> jbono...@apache.org
>> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > jbono...@apache.org
>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>>

Reply via email to