Agree. We already discussed about that on the mailing list. I mentionned this 
some weeks ago.

Regards
JB

⁣​

On Oct 26, 2016, 02:26, at 02:26, Dan Halperin <dhalp...@google.com.INVALID> 
wrote:
>My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including
>(shading
>or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
>module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and
>that
>thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
>broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an
>optional
>part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
>
>So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
>
>+1 (binding) on the release
>
>Thanks Aljoscha!
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
><aljos...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the
>artefacts.
>> The release was already close to being finished so I went through
>with it
>> but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly
>cancel in
>> favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin
><dhalp...@google.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
>> > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
>> >
>> > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered)
>relevant
>> LEGAL
>> > thread [2].
>> > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is
>how to
>> > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
>> >
>> > [0]
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
>> > [1]
>> >
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
>> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> > [2]
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
>> focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
>> > venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek
><aljos...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Team!
>> > > >
>> > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
>for
>> > > version
>> > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>comments)
>> > > >
>> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org
>> > > > [2],
>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>[3],
>> > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>API
>> > > reference
>> > > > manual [5].
>> > > >
>> > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
>providing new
>> > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>stable
>> > > source
>> > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>> > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Aljoscha
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> > > > [2]
>> > > >
>> >
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>> > > > [3]
>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> > > org/apache/beam/
>> > > > [4]
>> > > >
>> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
>> git;a=tag;h=
>> > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to