Hi Mark, Generally speaking, I agree.
As RunnableOnService extends NeedsRunner, @TestsWithRunner or @RunOnRunner sound clearer.
Regards JB On 11/09/2016 09:00 PM, Mark Liu wrote:
Hi all, I'm working on building RunnableOnService in Python SDK. After having discussions with folks, "RunnableOnService" looks like not a very intuitive name for those unit tests that require runners and build lightweight pipelines to test specific components. Especially, they don't have to run on a service. So I want to raise this idea to the community and see if anyone have similar thoughts. Maybe we can come up with a name this is tight to runner. Currently, I have two names in my head: - TestsWithRunners - RunnerExecutable Any thoughts? Thanks, Mark
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
