I'd suggest to proceed with 0.4.0-incubating (as JB previously planned). My reasoning: I don't think we'll be able to release a non-incubating release next week, regardless of the Board's graduation decision. I think it will take a while (more details to follow on a separate thread). On the other hand, 0.3.0-incubating has some important issues (e.g., template projects don't work across runners, WordCount has issues on Windows OS). I think it makes sense to fix these issues for our users, and have a better product if/when the graduation announcement comes.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Either way is fine for me too. > > We discussed about the release schedule independently from the graduation > process, that's why 0.4.0-incubator was planned around today. > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/13/2016 06:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> Hate to suggest this…. >> >> Assuming the Board OK’s the graduation next Wednesday, if we wait till >> then to do the build, we can drop the the incubator stuff entirely and it >> could be a “first release” outside of incubation. We could avoid the >> extra vote on the incubator list, etc…. >> >> Would it make sense to delay the week? Not a big deal either way, but I >> don’t think I’ve ever seen a project do a release between the graduation >> vote and the board vote. Every project I’ve seen decided to wait to have >> the “we’ve graduated!” release. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dan Halperin <dhalp...@google.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers, >>> including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon! >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Very good point Frances. >>>> >>>> Definitely something we have to do. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote: >>>> >>>> Sounds great, JB! >>>>> >>>>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the >>>>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great >>>>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some >>>>> significant >>>>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite >>>>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 >>>>> is >>>>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi beamers, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage >>>>>> this >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific >>>>>> Jira >>>>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
