I see, that's a valid point. As much as I would like Hive 0.11.1 to be a part of Bigtop 0.7, I would personally be ok with including Hive 0.11 in Bigtop 0.7 if Hive 0.11.1 is not out by that time.
Would it make sense to mention "Hive 0.11.*" in the Bigtop 0.7 BOM to allow us this flexibility? Mark On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > we have chatted with Roman about this and the problem is that we don't know > the target date for 0.11.1. It might be the end of September or November. > The > Teradata issue has like three months time frame to be addressed. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:55PM, Mark Grover wrote: > > To close the loop on Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7, I resurrected the thread > on > > Hive-dev mailing list and heard back that the 0.11.1 will address the > NPath > > UDF concerns. > > Reference: > > > http://markmail.org/search/?q=Proposing%20a%200.11.1#query:Proposing%20a%200.11.1+page:1+mid:n3vi4n4pwpqizdmh+state:results > > > > Consequently, I'd suggest that we include the to-be-released Hive 0.11.1 > in > > our Bigtop 0.7 release. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > The upcoming version of Spark is 0.8 - should be ready in a bit and > is > > > already > > > > pretty stable right now. > > > > > > Ok, I'll restart the VOTE. Sorry about missing it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > >
