+1 from me to drop 10.04. Thanks!
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > While I think "bleeding edge" is too sharp at times - and Hadoop 2.4 would > be > a great case in point with some pretty daunting performance regressions - I > agree with older systems point. I'd say let's drop it unless someone is > seriously want to champion the support. > > Any objections? > Cos > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 05:49PM, jay vyas wrote: > > I agree, +1 to drop old 10.04. > > > > I think in general, bigtop should be on the bleeding edge rather than > > spending time fixing issus on older systems. > > ... > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Did anyone had a chance to look at the hive package installation issues > > > below? > > > > > > I've pocked around and haven't come to anything conclusive ;( > > > > > > Unless there are ideas on how to fix the problem, I want to propose > this. > > > As a crazy work-around: we've dropped Centos5. Shall we do the same > with > > > 10.04? It is coming to the end of its support period in like 6 months > > > anyway. > > > And I am not sure how many are using that version, considering how > stable > > > 12.04 is. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > Cos > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:25PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > With the latest changes that went in over the weekend > > > > I'm happy to report that at least on the minimum set of > > > > package tests we're down to one issue only: > > > > > > > > http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/view/Bigtop-trunk/job/Bigtop-trunk-packagetest/label=lucid-slave/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > > > > > > > Various hive-* packages seem to fail on install > > > > on Ubuntu 10.04. > > > > > > > > If anybody can take a look -- it'll be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > Also, the Jenkins EC2 issues still remains and it > > > > seems to consistently affect only 2 of our dynamic > > > > slaves: fedora18 and opensuse12. The rest are fine. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > jay vyas >
