Hi,

I'm currently looking into the existing pull request for the Flink
integration [1].
While doing that, I wondered if its a requirement from Bigtop to build
Flink from source when building the rpm / deb packages?
Not building from source would speed up the build a lot and it would ensure
that the binary build is verified by the Flink community (there are some
issues with maven dependency shading when building Flink with maven 3.3.x)



[1] https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/93/files

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Konstantin, hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for the replies and the prompt progress on the pull request. It
> looks like we will have a Flink RPM package in Bigtop very soon. For
> the remaining integration we can open follow-up pull requests.
>
> If anything comes up while finishing up the work, please ping me!
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:01 PM, jay vyas <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Yup , we're getting there ! I tend to this sometimes in after work hours,
> > I'll call the grad students tonite, and see if they want to make a final
> > push this wknd on it, i can help them.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maximilian.
> >>
> >> Indeed. the saga of getting Flink into the Apache Bigdata stack has a
> long
> >> history ;) It's good to see it's finally converges. Your proposal of
> >> breaking
> >> the existing PR in peces certainly makes sense! That's how we prefer to
> do
> >> things as well - smaller changes are easier to check, fix, and even
> revert
> >> if
> >> needed.
> >>
> >> Another thing: we normally would expect to have a single commit for
> JIRA,
> >> so
> >> it would make sense to squash (rebase) the existing PR into smaller
> number
> >> of
> >> commits. Otherwise, it is pretty hard to navigate through all of them.
> >>
> >> Please don't hesitate to ping the list shall you need any assistance.
> >> Regards,
> >>   Cos
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:25AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'm an Apache Flink committer and I'd be very happy to see Flink enter
> >> > Bigtop. We have seen quite some interest in Bigtop in the Flink
> >> > community. I've been checking out Bhupendra Singh's pull request which
> >> > followed this thread: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/93
> >> >
> >> > The packaging of Flink remains one of the biggest hurdles for people
> >> > who want to install and run Flink on a cluster. Thus, that was my main
> >> > focus when reviewing the PR. Apart from a few issues I found, the pull
> >> > request looks good. It would be great if we could bring it into a
> >> > mergeable state.
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if it makes sense to break this pull request into several
> >> > pull requests? For example, one for the packaging, one for the puppet
> >> > scripts, and another one for the smoke tests. That could make
> >> > reviewing of the changes easier and people could already try out
> >> > incremental changes. I'd be happy to help out with the packaging and
> >> > scripting.
> >> >
> >> > What do you think about that?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Max
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > jay vyas
>

Reply via email to