Thank you, Evans. Would be really good to include 2.7.4.
Do you guys need the actual Hadoop release for inclusion into a BigTop
release?

Thanks,
--Konst

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Evans Ye <evan...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm actually OK to have 2.7.4 included in 1.2.1, if that's ready in master.
> Right now 1.2.1 release is blocked by building up a build slave docker
> image for SuSE 42.1.
> Once the obstacle removed. The release process will proceed.
> If 2.7.4 is ready then, we can try to include it.
>
>
> 2017-07-13 8:55 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>:
>
> > Oh, one more question: is there a JIRA ticket tracking 2.7.4 release? I
> > couldn't find it somehow. Thanks
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > Thanks Konstantin!
> > >
> > > I would venture the guess it includes mostly bug fixes and perhaps some
> > > minor performance improvements? I guess as such it won't be that much
> > > different from 2.7.3 we currently support. At least from the APIs and
> UX
> > point
> > > of view. Now, a few weeks might be an over-stretch (what is it by your
> > > estimation?) and we might not be willing to hold current release that
> > long,
> > > but this would RM's call (hey Evans!),
> > >
> > > Adding this to the master (presumably for 1.3 or even 1.2.2) is easy
> > though
> > > and should be done so we can upgrade the stack to the latest 2.7.x line
> > until
> > > 2.8 (or whatever would be the next one) line is mature enough. At any
> > rate, I
> > > have created BIGTOP-2839 to track this.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >   Cos
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:17PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > We plan to release Hadoop 2.7.4 in the next few weeks.
> > > > I was wondering if you could include it into Bigtop.
> > > > It would be really valuable to add Bigtop testing for the release.
> > > > I believe you already have support for earlier Hadoop 2.7 release.
> > > > Hope it wouldn't be too much trouble to integrate 2.7.4.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Konst
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to