Sorry, centos-6 build, not Fedora: https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-trunk-select-from-branch/OS=centos-6/21/console
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Cos, > > Looked at Fedora 6 build failure in the final Bigtop packaging stage: > > + tar --strip-components=1 -xzvf > ../hadoop-dist/target/hadoop-2.7.4-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz > tar (child): ../hadoop-dist/target/hadoop-2.7.4-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz: Cannot open: > No such file or directory > > Is it because of the "-SNAPSHOT" thing? Now that branch-2.7.4's version is > simply "2.7.4". > > Thanks, > > --Konst > > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I have re-built Hadoop from the latest RC on branch-2.7.4 [1] >> CentOS6 build has failed for some weird reason (7 is ok), but who >> cares about this old-crap really ;) >> >> [1] https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-trunk-select-from-branch/21/ >> -- >> With regards, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >> >> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, >> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author >> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> <shv.had...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Appreciate this, Cos. >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Just to wrap up this issue: 2.7.4 artifacts are being built by out >> >> Jenkins out of BIGTOP-2839 branch. >> >> The packages are available from the latest build. I will try to spin >> >> up some testing over the weekend to have some reasonable reassurance >> >> it is good enough to be included. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Cos >> >> -- >> >> With regards, >> >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, >> >> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author >> >> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Well, I am a bit at a pickle here. >> >> > >> >> > - the git build is broken and it's unclear why (I opened >> BIGTOP-2847 to >> >> track) >> >> > - no biggy, because I simply can download the zip file right of the >> >> Github >> >> > branch using [1]. Well, turns out there's an issue with 'expires' >> >> attribute >> >> > in the cookie and the zip file cannot be downloaded, failing with >> the >> >> > following error message >> >> > >> >> > Executing task ':hadoop-download' (up-to-date check took 0.001 secs) >> due >> >> to: >> >> > Task has not declared any outputs. >> >> > Invalid cookie header: "Set-Cookie: logged_in=no; domain=.github.com >> ; >> >> path=/; expires=Wed, 15 Jul 2037 02:22:41 -0000; secure; HttpOnly". >> Invalid >> >> 'expires' attribute: Wed, 15 Jul 2037 02:22:41 -0000 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > At this point I am at lost and I don't know how to proceed ;( Let me >> >> think about this for a moment. >> >> > >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/archive/branch-2.7.zip >> >> > >> >> > Cos >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:42AM, Evans Ye wrote: >> >> >> Cos, >> >> >> >> >> >> Can we build from git? >> >> >> Last time i tried and it doea not work. >> >> >> Would be great if you xan light me up a bit. >> >> >> >> >> >> MrAsanjar . <afsan...@gmail.com>於 2017年7月14日 週五，上午10:38寫道： >> >> >> >> >> >> > where is source for hadoop 2.7.4? can't find it in github. >> >> >> > need it to verify JIRA https://issues.apache.org/ >> >> jira/browse/HADOOP-13579 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < >> c...@apache.org> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:50PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >> >> > > > Certainly having an official release is much preferable. >> However, >> >> we >> >> >> > can >> >> >> > > try >> >> >> > > > to go with a branch for now. Say, I can change the patch to >> start >> >> >> > > building >> >> >> > > > from the git instead, so we can start testing it on a separate >> >> branch >> >> >> > > for now. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Is there at least a branch where the work is being done? I >> don't see >> >> >> > 2.7.4 >> >> >> > > in >> >> >> > > the github. Please advise. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > Once the release is ready (and if 1.2.1 is still unreleased on >> >> our end) >> >> >> > > we'll >> >> >> > > > move to the official bits. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Cos >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:33PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> >> >> > > > > Thank you, Evans. Would be really good to include 2.7.4. >> >> >> > > > > Do you guys need the actual Hadoop release for inclusion >> into a >> >> >> > BigTop >> >> >> > > > > release? >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > Thanks, >> >> >> > > > > --Konst >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Evans Ye < >> evan...@apache.org> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > I'm actually OK to have 2.7.4 included in 1.2.1, if that's >> >> ready in >> >> >> > > master. >> >> >> > > > > > Right now 1.2.1 release is blocked by building up a build >> >> slave >> >> >> > > docker >> >> >> > > > > > image for SuSE 42.1. >> >> >> > > > > > Once the obstacle removed. The release process will >> proceed. >> >> >> > > > > > If 2.7.4 is ready then, we can try to include it. >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > 2017-07-13 8:55 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik < >> c...@apache.org >> >> >: >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > Oh, one more question: is there a JIRA ticket tracking >> 2.7.4 >> >> >> > > release? I >> >> >> > > > > > > couldn't find it somehow. Thanks >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > Cos >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> wrote: >> >> >> > > > > > > > Thanks Konstantin! >> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > I would venture the guess it includes mostly bug >> fixes and >> >> >> > > perhaps some >> >> >> > > > > > > > minor performance improvements? I guess as such it >> won't >> >> be >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > > much >> >> >> > > > > > > > different from 2.7.3 we currently support. At least >> from >> >> the >> >> >> > > APIs and >> >> >> > > > > > UX >> >> >> > > > > > > point >> >> >> > > > > > > > of view. Now, a few weeks might be an over-stretch >> (what >> >> is it >> >> >> > > by your >> >> >> > > > > > > > estimation?) and we might not be willing to hold >> current >> >> >> > release >> >> >> > > that >> >> >> > > > > > > long, >> >> >> > > > > > > > but this would RM's call (hey Evans!), >> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > Adding this to the master (presumably for 1.3 or even >> >> 1.2.2) is >> >> >> > > easy >> >> >> > > > > > > though >> >> >> > > > > > > > and should be done so we can upgrade the stack to the >> >> latest >> >> >> > > 2.7.x line >> >> >> > > > > > > until >> >> >> > > > > > > > 2.8 (or whatever would be the next one) line is mature >> >> enough. >> >> >> > > At any >> >> >> > > > > > > rate, I >> >> >> > > > > > > > have created BIGTOP-2839 to track this. >> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > Thoughts? >> >> >> > > > > > > > Cos >> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:17PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi guys, >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > We plan to release Hadoop 2.7.4 in the next few >> weeks. >> >> >> > > > > > > > > I was wondering if you could include it into Bigtop. >> >> >> > > > > > > > > It would be really valuable to add Bigtop testing >> for >> >> the >> >> >> > > release. >> >> >> > > > > > > > > I believe you already have support for earlier >> Hadoop >> >> 2.7 >> >> >> > > release. >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Hope it wouldn't be too much trouble to integrate >> 2.7.4. >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> >> >> > > > > > > > > --Konst >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >
