Yup, I think it is ok, as far as there is a mention in the release notes
somewhere (which I assume would happen automatically if there's an
appropriate JIRA for this).
--
Cos
On 2020-04-27 20:03, Kengo Seki wrote:
Thanks Yuqi and Evans for driving this. I'm +1.
Kengo Seki <sekikn@ <sek...@gmail.com>apache.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Jun HE <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
I'm +1 for this.
Yuqi Gu <yuqi...@linaro.org> 于2020年4月26日周日 下午1:18写道：
Yes, the VOTE is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE.
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:39, Evans Ye <evan...@apache.org> wrote:
So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
If so I'm a +1.
In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to
user
what's there in Bigtop.
BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features.
However
if
someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix
Evans
Yuqi Gu <yuqi...@linaro.org> 於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道：
Hi folks,
Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
<https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/631> for BIGTOP-3327.
The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that
the
ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.
To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le
support
for Zeppelin in the next release?
The VOTE:
[ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
volunteer to
work on it.
BR,
Yuqi
--
With regards,
Cos
