On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35PM, Jun HE wrote: > Fully agree with Cos's comments. Yes, we need to ensure there are enough > resources, not only HW but also people's bandwidth, to contribute or a new > distro support will become an extra burden besides the existing list. I > think the Linaro folks can discuss with the OpenEuler community the details > of how they could support.
+1, Linaro's team effort would be a great example of how it should be done. Cos > I will do some early tests to understand how much effort it might be. > > Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> 于2022年6月7日周二 04:15写道： > > > Whatever we are going to decide, we need to keep in mind a couple of > > things: > > - CI hardware resources (where are they coming from and how much we need) > > - on-going support for this new OS: most of us here are well versed in > > deb/centos family of OSes. However, new one might prove to be a > > challenge > > even if it seems to be a descendant of Fedora (is it?). > > > > At any rate, if there's someone from that community willing to designate > > their > > effort on making it work (as usual, on a branch first and then rolling > > back to > > master if we can make it relatively non-disruptive) - I don't have much > > objections. > > > > -- > > Cos > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:25PM, Jun HE wrote: > > > OpenEuler is a distro initiated by Huawei and it is in rapid evolvement. > > > From its stat [1] OpenEuler has 300+ organization members and received > > > pretty many deployments in enterprise users, especially in China. I'm > > > wondering about your idea about OpenEuler support in Bigtop. The packages > > > management in OpenEuler is dnf based, which means it should be easy to > > port > > > our existing stack to OpenEuler. If the community is interested in this I > > > can do some exploration. :) > > > > > > 1. https://datastat.openeuler.org/en/overview > >
