On 27.03.2013 05:42, Ryan Ollos wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26.03.2013 15:15, Gary Martin wrote: >>> If nobody has noticed any blocking issues on the release then this >>> should probably be out. I don't know if there are any implications of >>> the release being associated with the incubating state but I guess we >>> will quickly see objections if there are problems with this approach. >>> Otherwise, treating all the new committee member votes as binding >>> seems to be appropriate. >> There is no incubating state. :) >> >> Go publish the release. >> >> -- Brane >> > Excellent, thanks! Just to confirm a few things so that I can edit > BloodhoundReleaseProcess correctly and don't mess up something with the > release... > > Are the following all true? > - All committers now have a binding vote > - We only need to do a single round of voting for a release and it happens > on the bloodhound-dev list > - Release announcements still go to [email protected]
Yes, yes, and yes. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
