I was thinking about that but each one alone does not warrant 2 months coding effort.
Peter On 27 March 2013 07:30, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27.03.2013 07:19, Peter Koželj wrote: > > I hope I am not to late, I have added > > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/490 to the list. > > What do you think? > > Not bad, but I'd split it in two; the first step (required) would be a > table-based workflow editor, modelled after Redmine's, for example. The > second step (optional) would be the WSYWIG thing. > > -- Brane > > -- > Branko Čibej > Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com > >
