On 05/04/13 13:42, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 05.04.2013 14:21, Andrej Golcov wrote:
I checked the license used by MusterTicketPlugin. It is similar to
Trac license (modified BSD license). So here there is no big
difference between candidates here.
In both cases, a lot of changes should be made and I do believe that
is very desired to have BH source in single repository to avoid
version incompatibility and other headache connected with supporting
two different source codebases.
If there is no objections, I will start with prototyping on trunk by
creating a new plugin bloodhound_ticket_links (enabled for dev
installation only) and at the end of prototype phase we can judge what
candidate to use.
In any case please create a proper vendor branch for the upstream plugin
sources, under ^/bloodhound/vendor.
-- Brane
I put a summary of
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.vendorbr.html to
demonstrate how to work with vendor branches in
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundVendorBranchUpgrade
and that includes a bit about adding new vendor branches towards the
end. Hopefully it makes sense.
Cheers,
Gary
