On 5/7/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07.05.2013 12:09, Gary Martin wrote: >> It does seem that we are close to achieving our major goals so a 1.0 >> release before the end of the month should be reasonable if we are all >> agreed. Are there any major obstacles that would get in the way? > > I got the feeling there's still a number of things to do on the ticket > relations and multiproduct front, many of them concerning feature > semantics. And very likely some spit and polish on the UI end of things, > which is fiddly and takes time. >
I agree with this ... > I'd propose to make at least two more releases and get some feedback > from actual users before calling anything 1.0; just my two cents. > However IMO I'd rather prefer next release to be 1.0 to emphasize the fact that major and non-trivial changes will be distributed . My two comments above are not logically exclusive . They make me think that it'd be appropriate to suggest that we release 1.0 alpha and/or beta and/or rc . AFAICR that's what these version qualifiers are meant for , especially now that we've graduated . What d'u think ? -- Regards, Olemis.
