On 5/7/13, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I missed this message ... > > On 5/7/13, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: >> Agree, at the minimum we need to get ticket relations working which are >> at >> least two weeks away. We need at least one 0.x release with working >> relations before proceeding to 1.0. >> > > IMO , the fact that we are distributing changes that make the new core > and BH plugins substantially different from what we've been releasing > until now has significant relevance as compared to the fact that some > features have to be improved in BH relations , core and other plugins > . The next version will not be an straightforward continuation of > previous work but a major DB, and API upgrade . The version number > (i.e. 1.0) will make that fact obvious to users whereas alpha , beta , > rc , ... will highlight that we are still working towards 1.0-stable > and are looking for further feedback , especially concerning plugin > compatibility after MP upgrades . >
PS: I also think that patches submitted in bh:ticket:514 might be critical for users of popular plugins e.g. XmlRpcPlugin . Even if it is mainly about tracd next-major installation procedure might have to be updated to deal with those changes for Apache and nginx as well ... cmiiw . -- Regards, Olemis.
