On 6/4/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, >
:) [...] > > On the assumption that we retain this product syntax, this test will > continue to fail. This does not appear to be a huge problem as, while > you cannot enter > > rfc-2396.compatible://link > > directly, the following form does work to let you add links of this form: > > [rfc-2396.compatible://link RFC 2396] > > Unless anyone is interested in finding a way to make the former link > work, I think we should replace the test with one that will work. > I'd rather suggest to change expected value of the former and add a new test case for the later (long) form . That way it will be evident that wiki syntax will not work , but TracLinks enclosed between brackets will do . -- Regards, Olemis.
