On 6/6/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/06/13 21:47, Matevž Bradač wrote: >> On 5. Jun, 2013, at 18:35, Joachim Dreimann wrote: >> [...] >>> The Financial Times has published an MIT-licensed >>> library >>> to 'fix' this: >>> http://labs.ft.com/articles/ft-fastclick/ >>> https://github.com/ftlabs/fastclick >>> >>> Should we include this library? I'm in favour of it because the increase >>> in >>> improved responsiveness. >> There was a discussion on Hacker News[1] wrt. the delays, which also >> lists >> some pros and cons. All things considered, I'm in favour of removing the >> delay (and thus including the fastclick library), if there are any user >> complaints we can always make it configurable. >> >> [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4083357 >> >> > > I think that would make sense.. perhaps it should be raised as a starter > ticket though. I take it that this should be pretty straight-forward. > > Making it configurable doesn't have to be a requirement unless we get > some complaints. >
Is there a chance to include it only if needed ? -- Regards, Olemis.
