On 06/06/13 14:51, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
If our current approach of a default product and redirections in order to
not expose the product complexity to users when they first get set up
causes too many issues, we should consider a different approach:
Simply asking users to set up their first product when they first launch
Bloodhound.
Then everything is always in products from the start, without the default
product weirdness.
- Joe
The default product is certainly a bit weird anyway, particularly when
it is referenced with '@'.
Actually, is it my imagination or does @-1 doesn't work as a ticket
reference anyway? Setting up a project with an appropriate name on first
launch or during setup seems like a good way to deal with this.
And another thing.. aren't we meant to have ticket numbers being used
sequentially within each product? Would this break anything else?
Cheers,
Gary
