On 23. Jul, 2013, at 16:31, Anze Staric wrote: > I suggest we also include fixes for #601, #608 and #609 in the bugfix release.
+1, these should definitely be included. Also, for the next release I think we should focus on adding more functional tests for the Postgres and MySQL databases. > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 7/18/13, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 7/18/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/17/13, Matevž Bradač <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 17. Jul, 2013, at 22:37, Alexander Heusingfeld wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 backward compatible bugfix releases should always have a minor >>>>> version >>>>>>> number >>>>>> >>>>>> +1, I'm also in favour of 0.6.1. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> JFTR , the Bloodhound project does not adopt the semantic versioning >>>>> [1]_ [2]_ . It should be ok to proceed with any of 0.6.1 or 0.7.0 , >>>>> even if 0.6.1 seems to be a logical choice (that I prefer) . >>>>> >>>>> .. [1] http://semver.org >>>>> >>>>> .. [2] http://markmail.org/message/pfjqchk47samthg5 >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1 Release a new bug fix release in the next few days. >>>> >>>> Thank you for starting this thread and giving the issue visibility. >>>> >>>> I've merged the two changesets associated with #592 into the 0.6 branch >>>> so >>>> that we can do some testing. I plan to do testing tomorrow. Please report >>>> back if you've tested the changes for a particular configuration and can >>>> confirm the issue is fixed on the 0.6 branch. >>>> >>> >>> This is what I did after checking out 0.6 branch : >>> >> [...] >> >> - Ran the unit test suite >> * test report http://goo.gl/NI2Bf >> * ... a few minor failures ! >> - Applied patches for #387 and ran the functional test suite >> * test report http://goo.gl/ZwCla >> * ... only expected failures >> >> I pasted the details in the wrong place . Sorry >> >>> Moreover blood-hound.net is running the code in /trunk and : >>> >>> - References to global: TracLinks are working as expected >>> * e.g. in http://dataviz.blood-hound.net/wiki/UserDoc/TracLinks >>> - URL generation for product: links is working fine too >>> * e.g. in http://dataviz.blood-hound.net/wiki/UserDoc >>> >>> ... and finally considering feedback received in #594 it seems that >>> SCRIPT_NAME issue will be gone after applying proposed patches (... >>> though I think I'll write a functional test case for that ... but that >>> may be scheduled as part of forthcoming milestones) >>> >>> IOW we should be really close to move forward with the release since a >>> few minor failures are noticed beyond known pending failures / errors. >>> We only have a few minor regressions . >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Olemis. >>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Olemis.
