Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618: Parent/child updates for QCT Olemis Lang Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:52:10 -0700 On 7/31/13, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On 31.07.2013 20:00, Olemis Lang wrote: >> Hi ! >> :) >> >> If you noticed a number of edits like the one shown below it's because >> I've been tagging some of them with bhnet keyword so as to identify >> the issues detected / reported while using/deploying blood-hound.net . > > I suspect that your using the Bloodhound logo the way you do may be a > trademark violation. Please consult > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ > > and tradema...@apache.org. > Thanks . I'll take a look asap . >> That will allow us to find them more quickly . >> >> I apologize if this caused any trouble and, if there's a chance to >> reduce the noise in te future, kindly request BATCH_MODIFY permission >> on i.a.o/bh . > > You have your own issue tracker on that site. It is unrelated to i.a.o/bh issue tracker . There's no single ticket in there about bloodhound . > IMO you shouldn't be > polluting the Bloodhound tracker with your private tags in this way. > Anyway , if the keyword is not allowed in i.a.o/bh please fell free to revert the changes . I'll do the necessary changes needed myself if I'm granted with BATCH_MODIFY permission. -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Previous message View by thread View by date Next message Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618: Parent/... Olemis Lang Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618... Branko Čibej Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] ... Olemis Lang Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618... Ryan Ollos Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] ... Olemis Lang Reply via email to

[Olemis Lang]

On 7/31/13, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 31.07.2013 20:00, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> Hi !
>> :)
>>
>> If you noticed a number of edits like the one shown below it's because
>> I've been tagging some of them with bhnet keyword so as to identify
>> the issues detected / reported while using/deploying blood-hound.net .
>
> I suspect that your using the Bloodhound logo the way you do may be a
> trademark violation. Please consult
>
>     http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
>
> and tradema...@apache.org.
>

Thanks . I'll take a look asap .

>> That will allow us to find them more quickly .
>>
>> I apologize if this caused any trouble and, if there's a chance to
>> reduce the noise in te future, kindly request BATCH_MODIFY permission
>> on i.a.o/bh .
>
> You have your own issue tracker on that site.

It is unrelated to i.a.o/bh issue tracker . There's no single ticket
in there about bloodhound .

> IMO you shouldn't be
> polluting the Bloodhound tracker with your private tags in this way.
>

Anyway , if the keyword is not allowed in i.a.o/bh please fell free to
revert the changes . I'll do the necessary changes needed myself if
I'm granted with BATCH_MODIFY permission.

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc