On 3/16/14, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14/03/14 16:08, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Antonia Horincar <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> So my question
>>> is:
>>> is the project useful for Bloodhound then?
>>>
>>>
>> The only thing about handling this with FUSE is that :
>>
>>   - AFAIK it will not work on Windows
>>     * See platforms in http://goo.gl/#analytics/goo.gl/EMHMvQ/all_time
>>   - It will not be possible to setup such on shared hosting plans
>>     * I'm still investigating whether we can setup this in
>> blood-hound.netservers.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> I think that there are meant to be ways of doing FUSE filesystems on
> windows.

I personally do not know sys admins recommending doing this e.g. the
ext4 FS support for Windows is quite problematic and annoying , afaict
.

> Whether they are any good is another matter.

ok , but at least we care about this for deploying this feature in
blood-hound.net web site sooner rather than later . For instance my
sys admin colleague freaked out after reading this issue

http://github.com/astrada/google-drive-ocamlfuse/issues/48

> Essentially my
> point was that if the admin is able to mount filesystems either with or
> without full root privileges then there is probably no programming to be
> done.

yes , that's a very promising approach

[...]

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Reply via email to