On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:42:50 +0100, Saint Germain <[email protected]>
wrote :

> > > I am currently working on an easy way to test/deploy Bloodhound
> > > based on Ansible + Vagrant.
> > >
> > > In theory we just have to do a "vagrant up" and the bloodhound
> > > website should be up and running in a VM.
> > > Or you can use directly the ansible-playbook on a real host to
> > > quickly build your website.
> > >
> > > I choose to work with Debian Wheezy + nginx + uWSGI
> > >
> > > I cannot give a deadline yet as I really don't know how long it
> > > will take me. But if other people are interested, we can share
> > > info on this subject.
> > >
> > > When it is ready it can perhaps be included in the trunk.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I thought that I should mention that I have recently looked at doing
> > something very similar. In my case I used salt rather than ansible
> > and using the apache2 webserver. I was going to see if I could redo
> > it to ansible as I assumed that vagrant would require the
> > salty-vagrant plugin. This is the main reason I didn't mention it
> > earlier - I felt that even the little extra effort involved in
> > getting the plugin installed on top of everything else might
> > discourage people trying it. Looking again I note that salt has
> > been supported for a while.
> > 
> > Anyway, definitely a good idea and well done for beating me to the
> > suggestion!
> > 
> 
> Hello Gary !
> 
> Some months ago I played a little with Salt as well after reading
> this:
> http://blog.gibbon.co/posts/2013-06-12-salting-your-django-stack.html
> 
> Indeed I had some problem installing everything (had to delve into the
> Ruby world a little) but at the end everything worked quite well.
> 
> Now I am repeating the experience with Ansible.
> 
> Being a total beginner in this area, I cannot really talk about
> advantages/drawbacks of Salt vs Ansible. However I like the way
> Ansible is working (through SSH).
> 
> I'll keep you updated !
> 

Ok it is done and working.

See ticket and patch here:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/796
https://bitbucket.org/saintgermain/bloodhound-mq/commits/1cc37f66124dfb45f4ddf3bdcc49a783a78db0da?at=default

Feedbacks are welcome, especially from those on Windows or MacOS.

Hope that we will have less installation problems with that.

Regards,

Reply via email to