It's good to know that you have followed this path of performance testing . The tests we have done also point out that this is a target for improvements . There's more work to do on that front , which implies quite a few changes in functional aspects of the issue tracking tools provided by Bloodhound .
On 7/23/14, Saint Germain <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have tested Apache Bloodhound installation on a quite good setup > (VPS with 3 vCores Intel Xeon CPU E5-2650, 3GB RAM, SSD) and with a > combination of Nginx + uWSGI + PostgreSQL. > > Using wrk (https://github.com/wg/wrk) as load testing tool, I managed > to serve a static HTML page at around 11000 requests/second (to have > an idea of Nginx performance on this hardware). > Serving a simple template with Django, I managed around 200 > requests/second. > > However serving the Apache Bloodhound startup page, I only manage > around 12 requests/second: >> ./wrk -t12 -c12 -d30s http://bloodhound.example.com >> Running 30s test @ http://bloodhound.example.com >> 12 threads and 12 connections >> Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev >> Latency 1.07s 232.48ms 1.54s 73.89% >> Req/Sec 0.71 0.63 2.00 51.94% >> >> 376 requests in 30.01s, 4.13MB read >> Requests/sec: 12.53 >> Transfer/sec: 141.01KB > > Can someone confirm that these numbers are more or less what is > roughly expected ? > Or is there some way I can optimize to win an order of magnitude ? > > If there is nothing I can do to improve these numbers, I will try to > use a cache tool like Varnish. > > To detail the software configuration: > 1) I have used the Nginx+uWSGI+PostgreSQL setup described in ticket > #796 (https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/796) with the > addition of serving static ressources directly by Nginx (I will update > the patch to reflect this later) > 2) I have tried several Nginx optimization tricks without any > significant changes (see for instance some Nginx tricks here: > https://github.com/perusio/piwik-nginx/blob/master/nginx.conf) > 3) I have tried playing with uWSGI processes and cpu affinity > parameters without any significant changes > > Thanks, > -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache(tm) Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
