> On Jan. 12, 2015, 3:28 p.m., Ivan Kelly wrote:
> > bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/client/UpdateLedgerOpTest.java,
> >  line 86
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28835/diff/5/?file=816122#file816122line86>
> >
> >     This causes test failures on my machine, and will on any machine where 
> > getLocalHostName() returns somethat resolves to 127.0.0.1 (most linux 
> > machines).
> >     
> >     Could you put baseConf.setAllowLoopback(true); in the constructor for 
> > BookKeeperClusterTestCase?
> >     
> >     It will fix the problem.

Thank you Ivan. It seems in windows machine it works fine.


- Rakesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28835/#review67649
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 11, 2015, 3:41 p.m., Rakesh R wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28835/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 11, 2015, 3:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for bookkeeper, fpj, Ivan Kelly, and Sijie Guo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: BOKKEEPER-634
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOKKEEPER-634
> 
> 
> Repository: bookkeeper-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> admin tool for changing the bookie's identifier to IP/hostname
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/BookieShell.java 
> a1e4639 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/client/UpdateLedgerOp.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/client/UpdateLedgerCmdTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/client/UpdateLedgerOpTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28835/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added few tests
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rakesh R
> 
>

Reply via email to