[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15179936#comment-15179936
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-896:
-------------------------------------------
GitHub user eolivelli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/20
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eolivelli/bookkeeper BOOKKEEPER-896
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/20.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #20
----
commit e33f2e01973f4d82dff8fad3a1d96e9037f4bdbb
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-11-25T16:07:13Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit c43f0b4e0a400ac87acbc278055e582177812e2d
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-11-25T16:15:25Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit 2a8e7008402ca7c1cf9188751b3e21ca2dcce7de
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-14T08:02:23Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit 94cdee6a99fb07938cc30806bbe99d78b8bb1b30
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-15T15:39:44Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit 227d50c7db634a23bd30cc3478ddfe3c307aaa62
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-30T21:51:43Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit 509ad4f31c5f10f96a0272d842120984ce2db04b
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-02-03T07:40:09Z
BOOKKEEPER-879: Record ledger creation time
commit eb17e3e884a98b91647ecba15e13a8f55aad61e1
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T09:36:36Z
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper
commit 072dd9d343b5e24d874b3d2c240dfa22aefc3d6d
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T10:55:38Z
BOOKKEEPER-896
commit 134be5ddb2bf2a468df9f0f0066fe1f9838c41a8
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T13:36:50Z
BOOKKEEPER-896
commit f2611257c50af320a7494b05cd647c4dfbb0121d
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T13:36:50Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit 9564d2897426c7ddd807730ec32166623f4e31ce
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T13:39:38Z
Merge branch 'BOOKKEEPER-896' of https://github.com/eolivelli/bookkeeper
into BOOKKEEPER-896
commit 70d5816dddb6ec393eeadbc2e7026a79a2e6f269
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T13:49:03Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit 730957730ea5643e23b26c4f6ff1aea9bde0fa2e
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T13:59:28Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit c3971e2513c4640e5dde3a721ea1f860479c3407
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T14:12:53Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit e4e36c721a07eb091b838a6b63a824ff35e77cc4
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T14:19:13Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit 6da9b34d808acba03405a0ee55aae00bb562d717
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T14:22:31Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit d93edd87314b17b7ea9f19d86a7bf1f1479c085b
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T14:23:42Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
commit f4778ea55802c4b406ab5ff61a3140c0dab171c2
Author: eolivelli <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-03-04T14:25:18Z
BOOKKEEPER-896: VM-local transport
----
> VM-local transport
> ------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-896
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-896
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0
> Reporter: Enrico Olivelli
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hi,
> I’m wondering if it is feasible to have a way to launch a Bookie and a
> Bookkeeper client in the same JVM without using network, valid use cases are:
> 1) Unit testing
> 2) Installations using a single Bookie
> 1) Unit testing
> For unit testing I’m using mock classes which reproduce the functions of
> Bookkeeper but it makes my code more complex.
> Running network-related libraries limits the possibility of running tests in
> parallel and slows down the overall throughput of the tests
> 2) Single Bookie deployment
> Sometimes I need to launch software which uses Bookkeeper in a single-machine
> deployment, in this case using an embedded Bookie will let to have only a
> single JVM process which runs the full stack of the service.
> For instance when I’m using Bookkeeper as a commit log I need to implement a
> commit log which uses Bookkeeper for replicated deployments, a simple “file”
> based commit log and a pure in-memory commit log for unit testing.
> I think it could be done using Netty LocalServerChannelFactory (and related
> client-side classes) and some tricks about the use of hostnames, registration
> on Zookeeper and so on
> Of course the same issue will be on Zookkeeper
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
