Flavio, I think there are some substantial improvements in some areas, here are few examples of non bug-fix changes:
BOOKKEEPER-841: Bookie should calculate ledgers map writing a new entry log file (Save a lot a read IO on bookie restart with at lot of data stored) BOOKKEEPER-889: BookKeeper client should try not to use bookies with errors/timeouts when forming a new ensemble (Quarantine bookies for a period of time if they are slow/misbehaving) BOOKKEEPER-895: GC ledgers that are no longer a part of the ensemble (Remove extra copies of ledgers already auto-replicated) BOOKKEEPER-894: add command to read ledger entries form shell BOOKKEEPER-892: Bookie sanity test These other changes have no immediate user benefit, but pose the base for further changes: BOOKKEEPER-851: Configurable LedgerStorage implementation BOOKKEEPER-901: Authentication framework (This was just from the changes we submitted from Yahoo branch, I think there are other non-bug fix change since 4.2) Matteo On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:33 AM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks, Sijie and Matteo, for working on this. Even though I'd like to see > 4.4.0 out, if all it contains are bug fixes, then we shouldn't cut a new > branch. What is it that you guys are planning on having that justifies > cutting a new branch? > > -Flavio > > > On 14 Mar 2016, at 06:16, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hello: > > > > Matteo and I had a discussion about releases. Release 4.4.0 is kind of > > taking too long. So we'd like to cut release 4.4.0 based on whatever we > > have that are marked for 4.4.0, targeting on end of this month. Matteo > > would like to drive this release. > > > > We'd like to start planning 4.5.0. I will start another thread for that. > > > > Here are the 4.4.0 jiras that are not resolved yet after I cleaned up. > > Could the owners of those jiras help updating the statuses of those > tickets? > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BOOKKEEPER%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > > Thanks, > > Sijie > >
