[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15658022#comment-15658022
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-959:
--------------------------------------
Since you are breaking the compatibility, we should add this feature now.
Also,
Can you create a jira about 'Security Support' and make it a master ticket and
link other security related tickets to that master ticket?
For BP (bookkeeper proposoal), the discussions should happen in the email
threads and jiras and the final design (the decisions made in the email
threads, jiras and meetings) should be updated to the BP document. And it
should finally land at the bookkeeper documentation when it is released.
> ClientAuthProvider and BookieAuthProvider Public API used Protobuf Shaded
> classes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-959
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0
> Reporter: Enrico Olivelli
> Assignee: Enrico Olivelli
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.5.0
>
>
> With 4.4.0 we introduced the ability to implement custom authentication
> plugins.
> The new interfaces ClientAuthProvider and BookieAuthProvider depend on
> ExtensionRegistry, which is a shaded dependency.
> As a consequence it is not possibile to implement any custom auth provider in
> code outside the project, because shaded/relocated dependencies cannot be
> used.
> We need to break the actual interface and introduce a new way to implement
> such plugins in a portable way
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
