[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849176#comment-15849176
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-950:
-------------------------------------------

Github user rithin-shetty commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/93
  
    @eolivelli I have added a new test case for testing the timeout of 
GET_BOOKIE_INFO op. See TestGetBookieInfoTimeout.java


> Ledger placement policy to accomodate different storage capacity of bookies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-950
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-950
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Rithin Shetty
>            Assignee: Rithin Shetty
>             Fix For: 4.5.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 672h
>  Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> In our environment, in Salesforce, we are likely to have bookie nodes with 
> different storage capacity: some will have 1TB others might have 3TB. Also, 
> our ledgers are likely going to be long lived. The current ledger placement 
> policy selects the bookies randomly leading to uniform distribution. This 
> would cause some of bookies to reach high utilization while the rest would be 
> underutilized. We need a new ledger placement policy that has higher 
> probability of selecting bookies with higher free disk space than the ones 
> with lower disk free space.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to