[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15882990#comment-15882990
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-552:
-------------------------------------------
Github user jvrao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/112
Couple of questions:
1. Charan with this change how does LongHierarchicalLedgerManager users
(Salesforce) has backward compatibility?
2. @knusbaum Why not keep LongHierarchicalLedgerManager around? even when
HierarchicalLedgerManager supporting both ids.?
> 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server, hedwig-server
> Reporter: Jiannan Wang
> Assignee: Kyle Nusbaum
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-552.patch, BOOKKEEPER-552.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-552.patch
>
>
> This task aims to find and implement 64 bits global unique ledger id
> generation mechanisms.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
