+1 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il mar 17 apr 2018, 20:57 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > Current docker images are auto-built by apache docker account. It > becomes a > > bit problematic in the release process. We might consider moving the > docker > > build process out of apache main repo. > > > > So I am restarting the discussion about "official docker image", > following > > what flink is doing. flink maintains a separate repo: > > https://github.com/docker-flink and update docker "official-images" > repo. > > > > We can do the similar thing: > > > > - create an `apachebookkeeper` org and a `docker` repo under it > > - update docker "official-images" > > > > The docker repo will be managed under bookkeeper pmc. So docker files > > update will only be done when a bookkeeper release is completed, which > > would make the release sequence clearer and also we are able to publish > > "docker-official" images. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Totally +1 > I really don't like that re-tagging procedure. > > Enrico > > > > > [1] https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/official_repos/ > > [2] https://github.com/docker-library/docs > > [3] https://flink.apache.org/news/2017/05/16/official-docker-image.html > > > > - Sijie > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
