On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:09 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for bringing this up. To start with, can we put all forms on LAC in
> a doc? i.e we have more than one way to read and write LAC.
> 1. What are the ways to send LAC to Bookies?
> 2. What are the ways bookies store the LAC?
> 3. What are the ways client can learn about LAC
> and the interfaces and configuration parameters around it, and what are the
> usecases of these?
>

+1 I would also like to see a doc (via BP on google doc) for this as well.

>
> I may be asking for more work here, but I think that way we can make more
> informed decision. What do you think Enrico?
> If you lead this, I will be more than happy to fill-in parts of this doc,
> and even review them.
>
> Thanks,
> JV
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:23 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bookkeepers,
> > I am trying to draw the best roadmap with the goal of consolidating
> > ExplicitLAC feature.
> > Currently I have two big topics:
> > - on the reader side I would like enable new API users to leverage
> > ExplicitLAC, transparently (no new configuration, now readflags, no
> > explicit API calls)
> > - on the writer side make ExplicitLAC work better with DEFERRED_SYNC
> (like
> > having a background force() together with the sending of ExplicitLAC)
> >
> > Currently I want to spend time mostly on the reader side, because it will
> > enable new clients to use ExplicitLAC.
> >
> > My current (new) idea is to add a new flag on readEntry() RPC with which
> > the client asks for the ExplicitLAC together with the entry.
> >
> > With this change we can support backward compatibility easily.
> > New clients will add that flag and they will be able to read the new
> > optional ExplicitLAC field.
> > Old bookies will ignore the flag.
> > Old clients won't ask for ExplicitLAC.
> >
> > If there is no ExplicitLAC this new feature won't add costs on the wire.
> >
> > After this discussion on the ML I will post a BP, if we agree that this
> > approach makes sense.
> >
> > I have started to draft a prototype yet, I would like to hear your
> opinion
> > (as usual I have very limited time)
> >
> > Regards
> > Enrico
> >
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>

Reply via email to