>The client can derive bookieId from a BookieSocketAddress. Any reason to tie the bookieId to the hardware? I may be missing something, but the whole BP is to give flexibility of Bookie changing its end points. If we make it a UUID, then it is independent and more flexible right?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:24 AM Matteo Minardi - Diennea < minardi.mat...@hotmail.it> wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm picking up the implementation of BP-38 right now, my starting point is > this draft PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2213 . > > Il giorno 19/01/20, 19:17 "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > Hi Bookkeepers, > any other comment on this BP ? > > Only Sijie left his option by now > > I am continuing to work at the implementation, but we can't merge it > if is > there is not enough consensus in the community > this is a major change, even if it is 100% backward compatible, but it > is > tracing the way for further improvements to the project > that currently are not possible, like decoupling the concept of > "bookieId" > from its network location. > > Please take a look and comment, approve or reject the proposal > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2214 > > Enrico > > Il giorno sab 4 gen 2020 alle ore 06:04 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> > ha > scritto: > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > Thank you for putting all these together. We are interested in this > > feature. > > > > I have made some comments in the proposal. PTAL. > > > > Thanks, > > Sijie > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:25 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > any interest in this proposal ? > > > > > > It will open up the way to having more information about the > services > > > exposed by bookies available to the clients and even to the > > PlacementPolicy > > > (in the future) > > > > > > I would like to see this kind of support in 4.11 > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il giorno ven 13 dic 2019 alle ore 00:30 Enrico Olivelli < > > > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have created a new BookKeeper Proposal "BP-38 Publish Bookie > Service > > > > Info on Metadata Service" > > > > > > > > Proposal: > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2214 > > > > > > > > Implementation (draft): > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2213 > > > > > > > > Master ticket: > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2215 > > > > > > > > Any feedback is really appreciated, for small comments you can > comment > > > > directly on PR #2214 (proposal page) other wise we can just > follow > > this > > > > email thread > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Jvrao --- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
