I think we can make 4.10.1 first?

- Sijie

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:05 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alessandro,
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> From my point of view these items are to be checked:
> - We have problems on Integration Tests (on GitHub Actions,
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2315/checks?check_run_id=600090302
> ,
> but I can reproduce the issue locally)
> - we have a few PR pending https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls some
> of them are trivial but very useful new features or bug fixes
> - we have this blocker issue from Ivan
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2303 that is related to a patch
> from Rajan already committed to master, we must reach consensus here
>
> I hope that we can address all of this topic soon, then we can cut 4.11.
>
> +1 about making 4.10 marked as stable as soon as we release 4.11
>
> Enrico
>
>
> Il giorno lun 20 apr 2020 alle ore 07:22 Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea
> <alessandro.luccar...@diennea.com.invalid> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi BookKeepers,
> > today is theoretically code freeze day for 4.11, see
> > https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/
> >
> > Also, in the last 4 month we have released no minor release for 4.10 and
> > 4.9 (and 4.9.2 is still referenced as the "stable" release).
> >
> > Are there any plan to proceed with a 4.11 release? Do we wait for 4.10.1
> > to declare 4.10 stable or we simply have to cast a vote?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alessandro Luccaroni
> > Platform Manager @ Diennea - MagNews
> > Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 Int. 924 - Mob.: (+39) 393 7273519
> > Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE
> > This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may
> > also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> > you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or disclose this
> > message. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the
> > sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its attachments and any
> copies.
> > Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other
> than
> > the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person responsible
> > may incur in penalties.
> > The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no
> > guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read only
> by
> > the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may be a need
> to
> > access this email by third subjects belonging to the Company.
> >
>

Reply via email to