H teami, Is it ok to include this PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3813? There are 3 approvals
--- Best Regards, R.C On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:28 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Enrico > > Il Mer 14 Giu 2023, 09:35 Wenbing Shen <oliver.shen...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > > +1000000000 > > > > I noticed https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 that issue was > > introduced in bookkeeper-4.16.0 by > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3847, > > and in pulsar-3.0. 0 version introduced bk-4.16.1. > > > > Our online business runs a pulsar-3.0.0 cluster, we and other > pulsar-3.0.0 > > users urgently need bk-4.16.2. > > > > Thanks, > > wenbingshen > > > > Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> 于2023年6月13日周二 09:30写道： > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > We have found one critical bug[1] in BookKeeper 4.16.1, and I would > > > like to discuss the starting 4.16.2 release to include some critical > > > bug fixes and improvements, such as [1] and [2] > > > > > > Here are the PRs for 4.16.2: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F4.16.2 > > > > > > If you have PRs that want to be included in this release, please > > > comment on that PR or tag the label `release/4.16.2`. > > > > > > After those PRs merged, I would like to volunteer to release this > patch. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Hang > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3983 > > > > > >
