[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055926#comment-16055926
]
Svetoslav Neykov commented on BROOKLYN-139:
-------------------------------------------
Sounds like this is already addressed by
https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-dns
> policy which sets up /etc/hosts on a group of servers
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-139
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-139
> Project: Brooklyn
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Alex Heneveld
>
> we could have a policy which we attach to an entity to collect all (or
> filtered) descendants which are SshMachineLocations and set up their
> /etc/hosts to have entries for each other
> this would solve issues where we don't have a working dns but we require
> machines to be contactable to each other and hostnames (not IPs) must be used
> (e.g. spark) or where it would be easier to have a canonical set of hostnames
> we can use, rather than figuring out which IP address should be used
> ---
> one suggestion on how to do this:
> enum NetworkAddressMode with values:
> * NONE (to leave out)
> * SUBNET (to use subnet/private address) [the default]
> * PUBLIC (to use public address)
> then config keys for the policy:
> * NetworkAddressMode ADDRESS_FOR_PUBLIC_HOSTNAME - which address to register
> for the PUBLIC_HOSTNAME sensor value (if not a numeric IP address)
> * NetworkAddressMode ADDRESS_FOR_SUBNET_HOSTNAME - which address to register
> for the SUBNET_HOSTNAME sensor value (if not a numeric IP address)
> * NetworkAddressMode ADDRESS_FOR_ONBOX_SHORT_HOSTNAME - which address to
> register for the short hostname (result of running `hostname` at the host;
> run skipped if set to NONE)
> * NetworkAddressMode ADDRESS_FOR_ONBOX_FULL_HOSTNAME - which address to
> register for the FQDN hostname (result of running `hostname -f` at the host;
> run skipped if set to NONE)
> and:
> - Boolean INCLUDE_SELF - for each machine, whether to include it in the
> updates made to /etc/hosts; default false, to only include other machines
> when updating a given machine, on the basis that the local hostname should
> already resolve and may want special treatment
> ---
> however i'd also like to find a better way to manage multiple addresses which
> a machine might have, rather than just hostname and subnet.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
