Hi Alex,

Please correct if I misunderstood you, but initial responses are:

 * We should not produce a 0.7.0-M2 outside of apache - as the brooklyn
   community, we should work towards an official apache release.
   However, if an external party (e.g. cloudsoft) chose to produce an
   interim release (e.g. 0.7.0-cloudsoft.M2) then that is fine.
 * Agree with switching to org.apache.brooklyn maven groupId in master.
 * For changing package names, folk like jclouds still use org.jclouds.
   None of their classes are in an org.apache package.
   I lean towards not renaming the packages for the 0.7 release.
   Let's discuss that in a separate e-mail thread with appropriate subject.
 * We should not turn off non-ASF CI servers.
   The ASF CI servers just run unit tests. For integration and live
   tests, we're relying on the machines kindly contributed by Cloudsoft.

Aled


On 02/07/2014 12:28, Alex Heneveld wrote:

Hi Andrew, All-

Thanks.  I have created the JIRA [1] to have ASF nexus access.

However there are some major changes we will have to make before we can use it:

* We must publish to a groupId under org.apache. (I have suggested org.apache.brooklyn.)

* We should move all classes to be under package `org.apache.brooklyn`. (This is not a strict requirement from what I see but I think it is best practice.)

Clearly this is going to be disruptive for our users. That said it is probably better to do this relatively soon, but I think we should have a stable release in the old namespace and coordinates first. So my suggested plan is:

1) Tweak existing (non-ASF) CI servers to build and publish snapshots to sonatype using the old co-ordinates, temporarily
2) Cut an 0.7.0 M2 and GA ASAP via the old channels
3) Then do the mass refactoring to use org.apache.brooklyn and publish an 0.7.0 into Apache. The groupId is different so there should be no confusion, but we should refrain from doing any code changes apart from Apache compliance so that the 0.7.0 versions are functionally identical modulo the namespaces. This will make it easier for people to cut over.
4) Turn off non-ASF CI servers.
5) Do all 0.8.0 dev in org.apache.brooklyn namespace (backporting only essential fixes if needed)

WDYT?

Best
Alex


[1]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7996


On 01/07/2014 22:03, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
Alex, Hi.

Have a look at this.

- http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html

It gives instructions for publishing to the ASF Nexus repository. It looks like we need to go through the steps listed at #signing-up to gain access to the server first. I think I have got the POM configured correctly (i.e. depending form the ASF parent POM) and so publishing snapshots should be as
simple as 'mvn deploy' once that is done.

If you could raise the appropriate JIRA that would be very helpful, then I
can set up the Jenkins job to deploy things to the ASF snapshot repo.

- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/

I believe this is mirrored to Sonatype as well.

Cheers,
Andrew.



Reply via email to