Hi Andrea,Alex,

Thanks a bunch...

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Andrea Turli <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Anamika,
>
> I just tested the following blueprint (add your prefered location to it)
>
> name: Riak-Cluster 1
>
> services:
> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakCluster
>   initialSize: 1
>   brooklyn.config:
>     provisioning.properties:
>       extraSshPublicKeyUrls: http://mypublickey
>
> Notice here I'm using
>
> type: org.apache.brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakCluster
>
> as I'm using the latest brooklyn 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT which rename the packages
> inside `software` module. If you are using the released 0.7.0-incubating
> you can stick with
>
> - type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakCluster
>
> To test that it actually worked you can copy the `host.sshAddress` sensor
> value from `Sensors` tab for each riak node and run:
>
> ssh <your-user>:<host.sshAddress>
>
> and
>
> ssh -i <Brooklyn_Stable-private-key> <your-user>:<host.sshAddress>
>
> HTH,
> Andrea
>
> ---
> FYI, in general, you don't need to specify the ssh PublicKey to ssh into
> the VMs provisioned by Brooklyn: it will try to use the ssh keys associated
> to the user that launched Brooklyn.
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 10:49 Anamika Roychowdhury <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > I feel there is no problem with alignment.
> > For a single Riak Node , I am able to ssh, but the problem comes when I
> am
> > trying to ssh to the node which is under Riak Cluster.
> >
> > The YAML that I am using for a Riak Cluster is following:
> >
> > name: Riak-Cluster
> > location:
> >    jclouds:aws-ec2:
> >       credential: zN7YwJ4hhH6d3lbr9koS7az1ZPOtK+hPaf8+EyTW
> >       identity: AKIAIVI6M354IOE3GU3Q
> >       region: us-west-2
> > services:
> > - type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakCluster
> >   initialSize: 2
> >   memberSpec:
> >     $brooklyn:entitySpec:
> >       type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakNode
> >   provisioning.properties:
> >     extraSshPublicKeyUrls:
> >       https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/gowribudal/Brooklyn_Stable.pub
> >
> > Is this the way I should provide ssh key for the cluster?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Andrea Turli <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Anamika,
> > >
> > > your blueprint looks correct to me but for a weird indentation in the
> > > extraSshPublicKeyUrls
> > >
> > > could you please try something like
> > >
> > > name: Riak-Node
> > > location:
> > >    jclouds:aws-ec2:
> > >       credential: My-Credential
> > >       identity: My-Identity
> > >       region: region
> > > services:
> > > - type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakNode
> > >   provisioning.properties:
> > >     extraSshPublicKeyUrls:
> > > https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/MyLocation/My_Public_Key.pub
> > >
> > > Let us know if that helps,
> > > Andrea
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 06:33 Anamika Roychowdhury <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > > > I have deployed a Riak cluster using the following YAML:
> > > >
> > > > name: Riak-Cluster
> > > > location:
> > > >    jclouds:aws-ec2:
> > > >       credential: My-Credential
> > > >       identity: My-Identity
> > > >       region: region
> > > > services:
> > > > - type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakCluster
> > > >   initialSize: 2
> > > >   memberSpec:
> > > >     $brooklyn:entitySpec:
> > > >       type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakNode
> > > >   provisioning.properties:
> > > >     extraSshPublicKeyUrls:
> > > > -  https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/MyLocation/My_Public_Key.pub
> > > >
> > > > I am not able to ssh to any of the node that has been created under
> the
> > > > Riak cluster using the private key (PORT 22 is open)
> > > >
> > > > But , While I have deployed a single Riak node using the following
> > > > blueprint, I am able to ssh to the instance:
> > > >
> > > > name: Riak-Node
> > > > location:
> > > >    jclouds:aws-ec2:
> > > >       credential: My-Credential
> > > >       identity: My-Identity
> > > >       region: region
> > > > services:
> > > > - type: brooklyn.entity.nosql.riak.RiakNode
> > > >   provisioning.properties:
> > > >     extraSshPublicKeyUrls:
> > > >      https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/MyLocation/My_Public_Key.pub
> > > >
> > > > Can anybody please tell me on where I'm going wrong or how should I
> > > > provide extraSshPublicKeyUrls
> > > > for the cluster , so that I can ssh to the cluster instances.
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
> > >  Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
> > >
> > > This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.
> If
> > > the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please
> return
> > > the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
> > > from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure.
> > Cloudsoft
> > > Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to
> > this
> > > message after it was sent.
> > >
> > > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> > > viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
> > > onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
> > > will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
> > > accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the
> > recipient
> > > should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers
> appropriate.
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
>  Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
>
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
> the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
> the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
> from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
> Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
> message after it was sent.
>
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
> onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
> will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
> accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
> should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
>

Reply via email to