Vote passes with the following result:
[3] +1 brooklyn-cli (rmoss, mmkenna, aturli)
[0] +1 brooklyn-commons-cli ()
[7] +1 brooklyn-client (aheneveld, asage, hadrian, dlloyd, gmacartney,
mzaccardo, cipi)
[0] -1 we do not need a separate repo
In fairness, I counted contributors votes as well, not just PMC, but any
way you count, the result is the same.
I will open an issue with infra@ requesting a separate 'brookly-client'
repo.
Thanks to all who expressed their thoughts and voted.
Hadrian
On 11/24/2015 08:59 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Brooklyners,
Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's
proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate git
repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, and
its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless strong
objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote is *not*
for the name of the executable (br or bk).
[+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal)
[+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo proposal)
[-1] we do not need a separate repo
Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours.
Cheers,
Hadrian
