Hi, James,

How about this suggestion? 
Using apr's time instead of nspr's time

Thanks'

在 2019/3/28 上午2:23,“Dave Fisher”<dave2w...@comcast.net> 写入:

    Hi -
    
    Have a look at the Apache Portable Runtime’s time routines.
    
    https://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.5/group__apr__time.html
    
    Regards,
    Dave
    
    Sent from my iPhone
    
    > On Mar 27, 2019, at 1:55 AM, tan zhongyi <zhongyi....@gmail.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi£¬ guys,
    > 
    > Here is one issue that may block our first apache release
    > 
    > I checked the code, notice we are using nspr,
    > /src/butil/third_party/nspr/prtime.h
    > /src/butil/third_party/nspr/prtime.cc
    > /src/butil/third_party/nspr/LICENSE
    > 
    > From their HEAD, we know that 
    > They are  Dual-license, GPL-2.0+, LGPL-2.1+, MPL-1.1
    > 
    > GPL & LGPL are not allowed for apache release, 
    > But how about MPL-1.1?
    > 
    > Can we include these three files?
    > 
    > Thanks
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
?B‹KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB•?È?[œÝXœØÜšX™K??K[XZ[?ˆ??]‹][œÝXœØÜšX™P?œœ?˘\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB‘›Üˆ?Y??]?[Û˜[??ÛÛ[X[™?Ë??K[XZ[?ˆ??]‹Z?[???œœ?˘\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB
    

Reply via email to