Thanks， tangjie，
It seems that we have missed some third-party's file,
We need to check them again.
-1 , vote closed as not Go.
@JiashunZhu, we need to check these files one by one and build rc3 later.
BTW: JB, please cancel your investigation and focus on the next rc3 release ,
thanks
在 2019/8/29 下午2:02，“Tang,Jie(EE)”<tangji...@baidu.com> 写入:
A list of 30 files without license header, including CPP and shell, was
compiled by Rat tool.
1. Rat tool will have false alarms and do some filtering work.
2. Makefile, markdown file, refer to other Apache projects without license,
there is no license.
This is files list:
build_in_travis_ci.sh
config_brpc.sh
example/multi_threaded_echo_fns_c++/random_kill.sh
src/brpc/callback.h
src/bthread/context.cpp
src/bthread/context.h
src/brpc/details/tcmalloc_extension.cpp
src/butil/linux_magic.h
src/butil/intrusive_ptr.hpp
src/butil/recordio.cc
src/butil/third_party/modp_b64/modp_b64_data.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/biginteger.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/diyfp.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/dtoa.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/ieee754.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/itoa.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/meta.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/pow10.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/stack.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/strfunc.h
src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/strtod.h
src/butil/unique_ptr.h
test/bthread_sched_yield_unittest.cpp
test/file_watcher_unittest.cpp
test/recordio_unittest.cpp
test/run_tests.sh
test/string_splitter_unittest.cpp
tools/add_syntax_equal_proto2_to_all.sh
tools/print_gcc_version.cc
tools/rpc_press/client.py
在 2019/8/14 下午9:46，“tan zhongyi”<zhongyi....@gmail.com> 写入:
Hi, guys,
another round of vote begins
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache
brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc02.
The source code can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz
The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.6-rc01,
available here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.6-rc02
The SHA-512 checksum is:
cd737f4cc9c69cd15d58fbee0d64f14383ef0dc5727b74e2c1bdcec95fcaa1fad4d8e31fa9341931722552231f5b38aa5acfb5558007a03cc6b77f3c4b20c611
which can be found via:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512
The signature can be found via:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
KEYS file is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
[Release Note]
* Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
* Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
* Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
* Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
* bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
* String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
* Support for bilibili discovery service
* Improved CircuitBreaker
* grpc impl. supports timeout
Please vote on releasing this package as:
Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc02
This vote will be open until “Fri Oct 19 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)"
and
passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Checklist for reference:
[ ]Are release files in correct location?
[ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
[ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
[ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
[ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
[ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
[ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
[ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
NOTICE?
[ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
[ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
[ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
[ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
[ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
file?
[ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
[ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
control?
[ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
[ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,
please
feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org
