Thanks, dave.
在 2019/9/4 上午12:44，“Dave Fisher”<w...@apache.org> 写入:
Hi -
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 10:59 PM, tan zhongyi <zhongyi....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, kevin & JB & von,
>
> We have included one file named as valgrind.h under brpc’s source code.
>
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/src/butil/third_party/valgrind/LICENSE
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/src/butil/third_party/valgrind/valgrind.h
>
> According to its license statement, valgrind.h is released under BSD
style license,
> Other part of valgrind is released under GPL v2.
>
> But we only include valgrind.h and its license file.
>
> And I also get its original version as
> https://github.com/svn2github/valgrind/blob/master/include/valgrind.h
You should include this version of the header file.
You need to incorporate the BSD license in the overall LICENSE for Doris
with a heading pointing to the header file in the Doris source.
>
> we will include them in our next apache release
> So it looks that it is safe for us to include valgrind.h and its License
in brpc’s source tarball,
> right?
Is valgrind a dependency in any way? If so then this is a different issue.
Regards,
Dave
>
> Please help us to confirm, thanks
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org
