Hi, Von & JB & Kevin,
Please take a look,
Thanks

On 2019/12/16 05:00:53, tan zhongyi <z...@gmail.com<mailto:z...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
>
>
> Hi, guys,>
>
> Please action,thanks>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2019/12/09 13:33:43, tan zhongyi 
> <z....@gmail.com<mailto:z....@gmail.com>>> wrote:>
>
> > Hi, guys,>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.>>
>
> >>
>
> > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of  apache 
> > brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > The source code can be found at:>>
>
> >>
>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz%3e>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available 
> > here:>>
>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02><https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02%3e>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > The SHA-512 checksum is:>>
>
> >>
>
> > ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > which can be found via:>>
>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512%3e>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > The signature can be found via:>>
>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc%3e>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > KEYS file is available here:>>
>
> >>
>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS%3e>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > [Release Note]>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >   *   Fix many license related issues>>
>
> >   *   Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level>>
>
> >   *   Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac>>
>
> >   *   Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink>>
>
> >   *   Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.>>
>
> >   *   bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services>>
>
> >   *   String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator>>
>
> >   *   Support for bilibili discovery service>>
>
> >   *   Improved CircuitBreaker>>
>
> >   *   grpc impl. supports timeout>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > Please vote on releasing this package as:>>
>
> >>
>
> > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and>>
>
> >>
>
> > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are>>
>
> >>
>
> > cast.>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > [ ] +1 Release this package>>
>
> >>
>
> > [ ] 0  I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object>>
>
> >>
>
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > Checklist for reference:>>
>
> > [ ]Are release files in correct location?>>
>
> > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?>>
>
> > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?>>
>
> > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?>>
>
> > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?>>
>
> > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?>>
>
> > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?>>
>
> > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or 
> > NOTICE?>>
>
> > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?>>
>
> > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:>>
>
> > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?>>
>
> > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?>>
>
> > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?>>
>
> > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:>>
>
> > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE 
> > file?>>
>
> > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?>>
>
> > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version 
> > control?>>
>
> > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?>>
>
> > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please>>
>
> >>
>
> > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.>>
>
> >>
>
> > Thanks>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to