+1

On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 at 15:24, caidaojin <642580...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
> 发件人:
>                                                   "dev"
>                                                                 <
> lorin...@apache.org&gt;;
> 发送时间:&nbsp;2021年8月23日(星期一) 凌晨0:10
> 收件人:&nbsp;"dev"<dev@brpc.apache.org&gt;;
>
> 主题:&nbsp;[VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02
>
>
>
> Hello Apache brpc (Incubating) Community,
>
>
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache brpc (Incubating) version
> 1.0.0-rc02
>
>
>
> [Release Note]
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Fix a latency issue caused by event_dispatcher
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Fix bug that time unit is not listed in grpc timeout options
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Fix heap overflow in simple_data_pool
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Support the length of redis args could be zero
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Fix bug that may throw out of index in rpc_replay
> &nbsp;&nbsp; - Fix an access-after-return issue in TimerThread
>
>
>
> The release candidates:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc02/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.0.0-rc02
>
> Release Commit ID:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/commit/7a49b3586972cf201a340f22b47c1810998c854e
>
> Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
> PMC vote is +1 binding, all others is +1 non-binding.
>
>
>
> Checklist for reference:
>
> [ ] Download links are valid.
>
> [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>
> [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> release.
>
> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
>
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
>
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
>
>
> Thanks

Reply via email to