On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, I'm almost certain that I'm not a collaborator on buildr/buildr. (am > I?) I did used to have a fork of vic/buildr, but that has been deleted. I > could actually fork off of assaf/buildr, but I would rather fork from the > main. > > I thought all the magic was already worked. :-) What else is left? That was in reference to *don't fork/clone my repository*. I'm going to nuke and replace mine now. Assaf > > > Daniel > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Assaf Arkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > For some reason, I cannot GitHub fork the buildr/buildr repository. > Any > > > idea why this would be? > > > > > > Neither can I, and there could be two reasons for that: > > > > a) You can't have two forks with the same name, so if you forked > > vic/buildr > > you can't also fork buildr/buildr. > > b) You're a contributor on the project, apparently you can't fork a > > project > > you're contributing on. > > > > Meanwhile best thing to do is *not* fork or clone my repository, but wait > a > > couple of days for Victor to work his magic. > > > > Assaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Victor Hugo Borja < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I'm on it [1], it would eventually become the town-hall git > repository, > > > it > > > > was based on Jukka's mirror, using the same authors file. I'm working > > on > > > > updating the aliases on buildr-git.rb. You can clone it an start > > rebasing > > > > your experimental branches on it. > > > > > > > > ruby -ropen-uri -e 'eval(open(" > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/buildr/trunk/doc/scripts/buildr-git.rb?view=co > > > > ").read)' > > > > > > > > The intent of [1] instead of using vic/buildr is that I'd like [1] to > > be > > > an > > > > exact mirror of what is in Apache SVN (including trunk, branches, > > tags), > > > > and > > > > use my vic/buildr for my experiments, so that you don't have to pull > my > > > > insane code unless you want. > > > > > > > > Also I think we could use github.com/buildr to host plugins people > > > develop > > > > and maintain, but that not necessarily need to be part of the > official > > > > Buildr source base. When some code looks like must be in buildr's > > trunk, > > > we > > > > can always create a JIRA issue, giving ASF permission to include the > > > code, > > > > and then merge with trunk. > > > > > > > > I've added Buildr commiters as collaborators on [1] so they can > > > synchronize > > > > manually whenever they want, I'm just waiting for the git aliases to > be > > > > ready. > > > > > > > > [1] http://github.com/buildr/buildr > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Vic's mirror is only updated against the incubator repository. > It's > > > > > actually up to date with respect to that repository, but Buildr has > > > since > > > > > moved to a top level Apache project. This means that the git > clones > > > have > > > > > to > > > > > be rebuilt, and everybody with experimental branches will need to > > > rebase > > > > > (see thread "Welcome to Rebase Hell!" on the users list). > > > > > > > > > > I'm currently working off of Assaf's clone ( > > > > http://github.com/assaf/buildr > > > > > ), > > > > > which should be up to date with the canonical SVN. Eventually, > AFAIK > > > the > > > > > plan is to rebuild Vic's clone based on the new SVN and keep it > > > > > automatically updated as before. Hopefully that rebuild start's > from > > > > > Assaf's, avoiding the need to rebase *again*. :-) > > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Stephen Bannasch < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I saw that Alexis's git integration patch was applied because I > was > > > > > > watching: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-222 > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a git clone of Vic's git mirror of buildr: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://github.com/vic/buildr/tree/master > > > > > > > > > > > > and opened my up-to-date clone in GitX to see what the patch > looked > > > > like > > > > > > but it wasn't there. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vic's github mirror of the svn repo: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/buildr > > > > > > > > > > > > is described on the Buildr site here: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://buildr.apache.org/contributing.html#git > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't appear to be being updated. > > > > > > > > > > > > The last commit on the mirror is Assaf's commit from svn rev > > 735108: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://github.com/vic/buildr/commit/e35bc0fe8a0309d4cfdfb980af61cdb6f1a9990c > > > > > > > > > > > > And adapted RubyForge task accordingly > > > > > > > > > > > > git-svn-id: > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/buildr/tr...@735108 > > > > > > 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 > > > > > > > > > > > > I've setup git mirror's of svn repos and use svn post-commit > hooks > > to > > > > > > initiate an update of the a private intermediate git svn clone > > which > > > > then > > > > > > pushes to the public git repo. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this kind of integration with svn possible in Apache svn > > > > repositories? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > vic > > > > > > > > Quaerendo invenietis. > > > > > > > > > >
